凱史同好的心得分享

非來自凱史直接的知識分享
================================ 
我問，碳棒做的甘斯，與原始奈米塗銅做的甘斯，兩者的差別。
我總覺得有。
我問為我執行『精神回應療法』的醫生，
他用擺錘測試，我們『對等離子體科技的指引團隊』。
他能接受的能力準確度達99%，
結果是碳棒，與原始的奈米塗銅，
都能做出65% ZnO ，與35% CO2.(甘斯)。
碳棒跟其他的方式，用在醫療跟發電，效率都是高達85%。
我問到15 %？如果用奈米塗銅呢，會承接這15%嗎？
奈米塗銅所做出的甘斯，更能進入別的次元/多次元的門戶點
是的……確認了我所懷疑的
你的心得呢？
 
 
FYI.... i asked into the difference between the GaNS made from carbon stick method and the original Method using Nanocoated copper.... i kept feeling like there was some difference .... I Asked the Dr who does my testing ( SRT method) using pendulum and "Our Guidance Team for the plasma technology" and his ability to receive numbers with 99% accuracy. Result: the carbon Stick and original method both make about 65% ZnO and 35% CO2. 
The Carbon stick is 85% as effective as the other method for Health and Power Applications . I asked more into the 15 % and what that is..... came up with that the other 15% afforded by using real Nanocoated copper gives the GaNS more of a " Other dimensional/ multidimentional access point".... yes.. thats confirming what i was feeling/suspected. what do you all get?
 
 
 
arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    妙妙貓 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

    E-mail轉寄